Roberto Cid Subervi vs Cannon Kingsley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing second serve performance in the recent months provides significant insights for predicting match outcomes. Kingsley has notably secured 41.89% of points on their second serve in the last six months. In contrast, Subervi has achieved a slightly lower rate of 37.53%, indicating Kingsley could have an edge in this aspect.

Examining the return game statistics, Subervi outperforms Kingsley by a margin in winning second serve return points, with Subervi at 45.28% compared to Kingsley's 40.67%. The difference is even more pronounced in first serve returns, where Subervi dominates with a 30.05% as opposed to Kingsley's 23.6%. These metrics suggest Subervi could have a tactical advantage in this area.

Under pressure, both players have shown resilience, although slightly more so on Kingsley's part. Kingsley has managed to save 48.65% of breakpoints faced, while Subervi has saved 46.32%. This measure can be crucial for betting predictions, highlighting Kingsley’s potential ability to withstand critical moments better.

Reviewing the overall performance, Kingsley claims a 53.85% win rate (W/L 28/24) over the past year. Subervi, however, demonstrates a stronger record with a 66% win rate (W/L 33/17), suggesting Subervi enters this match with greater form and consistency.

Surface preferences further differentiate the players' strengths. Kingsley excels on clay with a 64% win rate (W/L 32/18), whereas Subervi shows proficiency on hard courts, winning 61% (W/L 138/88). Conversely, Subervi struggles on grass, without securing any wins.

Regarding the level of opponents faced, Kingsley and Subervi have competed against average opponents ranked 169.04 and 163.68, respectively. Despite the small difference, Subervi has generally faced tougher competition, potentially honing their competitive edge.

In tournaments, Kingsley usually competes at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 59.38% of those matchups (W/L 19/13). Comparatively, Subervi boasts an even better performance, winning 80.56% (W/L 29/7), highlighting their capability at this competition level.

Set performance, particularly in deciding sets, marks another area of parity. Both Kingsley and Subervi have captured 50% of deciding sets in the past year, suggesting a closely contested battle if the match extends.

Reflecting on break point opportunities, Subervi displays a superior conversion rate, capitalizing on 45.68% of break chances compared to Kingsley’s 31.33%. This proficiency in breakpoint situations might favor Subervi in tightly contested games.

Considering these comprehensive analyses, Subervi seems to have a slight statistical edge. Especially given their higher match win percentage, adeptness on their preferred surface, and efficiency in converting break points, Subervi appears poised to emerge victorious in the upcoming encounter.